INTERNATIONAL — THE ABSENCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND INTEGRITY CONSTITUTES A DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW, A DENIAL OF THE RIGHT TO TRUTH, A BETRAYAL OF THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND REPRESENTS A PROFOUND CIVILIZATIONAL REGRESSION - MINDD & COTG UNITED : "Do modern day courts betray justice by forsaking the task of truthful factfinding" by Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI (Collaborations occurring Dec. 12-14, 2025)

INTERNATIONAL —

THE ABSENCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND INTEGRITY

CONSTITUTES A DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW,

A DENIAL OF THE RIGHT TO TRUTH,

A BETRAYAL OF THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, OF BRAZIL, AND OTHER COUNTRIES, 

AND REPRESENTS A PROFOUND CIVILIZATIONAL REGRESSION.

Do modern day courts betray justice by forsaking the task of truthful factfinding" by Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI (Collaborations occurring Dec. 12-14, 2025)
By Scott E Stafne

description

511 Pages

link

1 File ▾

sell

Criminal Law,

Criminal Justice,

Constitutional Law,

Human Rights Law,

International Law

Show more

These collaborations examine a foundational question common to all systems of law: whether courts betray justice when they decline to find and adjudicate the facts of disputes that fall squarely within their jurisdiction. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Developed in the context of an Article 15 communication to the International Criminal Court concerning mass atrocities in Nigeria, the inquiry expanded to consider parallel failures within the United States-particularly in foreclosure and consumer-credit adjudication-where courts increasingly enforce outcomes without resolving contested facts regarding ownership, standing, and legal authority. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Drawing on natural law, international law, constitutional traditions, and contemporary legislative efforts to restore transparent fact-finding, these discussions argue that adjudicatory justice is not discretionary. When institutions refuse to perform their truth-finding function, the vacuum is filled not by neutrality, but by power-whether exercised through military force, bureaucratic procedure, or private financial systems. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The work is offered as a comparative inquiry, inviting judges, lawmakers, and citizens to confront the shared consequences of institutional non-adjudication across national and legal boundaries.

arrow_downward

Download PDF