A VIOLAÇÃO DO MEU DIREITO A TER DIREITOS , POR MARCIA ALMEIDA
A PURA ARBITRARIEDADE DA DEFENSORIA PÚBLICA DO RIO DJANEORIRO É A MAIOR VIOLÊNCIA INSTITUCIONAL E VIOLAÇÃO DE DIREITOS HUMANOS QUE JÁ SE VIU !
EM PLENO SECULO XXI A DEFENSORIA PUBLICA DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO, MENTINDO, E CONTRARIANDO SUA MISSÃO CONSTITUCIONAL E TODAS AS PROVAS NOS AUTOS, E ME EXCLUIU DO REGIME DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO, SEM DIREITO AO CONTRADITÓRIO E AO DEVODO PROCESSO LEGAL !!!
EU SOU MARCIA ALMEIDA, 73 ANOS , ATIVISTA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS, RENDA LÍQUIDA MENSAL DE TRES SALARIOS MÍNIMOS, HYPER-VULNERAVEL, VITIMA DE CRIMES HEDIONDOS, DE CRIMES CONTRA A ORDEM PUBLICA, VITIMA DE CRIMES HEDIONDOS E VITIMA DE VIOLÊNCIA DE GÊNERO, VIOLÊNCIA FAMILIAR , VIOLÊNCIA INSTITUCIONAL, CORRUPÇÃO ATIVA E PASSIVA,
A RECUSA ARBITRARIA, ILEGAL E INCONSTITUCIONAL DA DEFENSORIA PUBLICA DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO, E DO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO , QUE ME EXCLUIRAM DO REGIME REPÚBLICANO PARA PERPETUAR OS CRIMES PRATICADOS CONTRA O ESTADO E CONTRA MIM POR MILICIANOS DE FALSOS CONDOMINIOS DA GLEBA 8D DO LOTEAMENTO DA GRANJA COMARY , E A EXTORSÃO JUDICIAL CONTRA AS VITIMAS DE FALSOS CONDOMINIOS E DE VIOLAÇÃO GRAVÍSSIMAS DE MEUS DIREITOS HUMANOS E DE OUTROS IDOSOS EM SITUAÇÃO ANÁLOGA É CAUSA DE NULIDADE ABSOLUTA INSANAVEL DE TODAS AS DECISÕES PROFERIDAS CONTRA MIM, E OBJETO DE VERGONHA INTERNATIONAL.
Onde estão os milhares de advogados e de vitimas de abusos judiciais e violência, que eu ajudei a defender desde os anos 2000 ?
EM 1962 A SUPREMA CORTE DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS ATENDEU AO PEDIDO DE UM IDOSO E INDICOU UM ADVOGADO PARA SUA DEFESA DEFESA
UM HABEAS CORPUS MANUSCRITO A LAPIS QUE MUDOU A JURISPRUDENCIA DA SUPREMA CORTE DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
The handwriting was shaky. The spelling, uncertain. Written on official prison paper, with a pencil so worn that it barely left a mark, that five-page petition hardly resembled the elegant documents that usually arrived at the Supreme Court of the United States.
But on January 8, 1962, when the handwritten letter of Clarence Earl Gideon reached the highest court in the country, it carried a question so simple—and at the same time so profound—that the nine justices could not ignore it:
> “The question is very simple. I asked the court to appoint me a lawyer, and the court refused.”
A path that began with a mistake
Eighteen months earlier, in the stifling Florida summer of 1961, the life of Gideon—51 years old, poor, itinerant, with almost no formal education—had taken the turn that would forever change American criminal law.
On June 3 of that year, the Bay Harbor pool hall, in Panama City, had been broken into. A broken door, a vandalized cigarette machine, some coins, five dollars, bottles of beer and soda missing. Nothing more than that.
Still, a single witness claimed to have seen him there. That was enough for him to be arrested.
Gideon swore he was innocent. Few listened.
A simple request — and denied
On August 4, 1961, he appeared in court: without a lawyer, without money, without even understanding the language of the law. With the humility of someone who barely knew how to address a judge, he made the request he believed the Constitution guaranteed him:
> “Your Honor, I ask that a lawyer be appointed to represent me.”
Judge Robert L. McCrary Jr. replied courteously, but without room for hope:
> “I’m sorry, Mr. Gideon. Florida law only allows appointment in cases involving the death penalty.”
He would have to face the State alone. Question, argue, defend himself—all with only an eighth-grade education.
It was not enough. The jury found him guilty. On August 25, he received the maximum sentence: five years in state prison.
From the silence of a cell, a revolution was born
Most people would have given up. Gideon did not.
In the prison library, he immersed himself in books he could barely understand. Little by little, he deciphered the meaning of the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees the assistance of counsel. He read the Fourteenth, which protects due process of law.
And then he perceived the truth:
If the rich have lawyers, why should the poor face the system alone?
He filed a petition with the Supreme Court of Florida. It was rejected without explanation.
And so, with the same short pencil, he wrote to the U.S. Supreme Court. A simple letter, crooked, almost childish.
A poor man, asking the entire country for justice.
And against all odds, the Court listened.
The case that rewrote the law
On June 4, 1962, the Supreme Court agreed to hear his case. And since Gideon could not hire anyone, he was appointed one of the greatest lawyers in the country: Abe Fortas, who years later would become a justice of the very same Court.
The question before the justices was as clear as it was revolutionary:
Does a poor defendant have the right to a lawyer provided by the State?
Since 1942, the precedent Betts v. Brady had said no—except in “special circumstances.” But the legal conscience of the country had changed.
On January 15, 1963, Fortas presented his argument:
> If even Clarence Darrow, the greatest criminal defense lawyer in America, hired a lawyer when he himself was accused,
how could a poor man defend himself alone?
The answer, at last, was obvious.
A verdict that echoed for generations
On March 18, 1963, the Supreme Court announced its decision:
Unanimous. 9 to 0.
The right to a lawyer was not a luxury. It was not a favor. It was fundamental to justice.
Gideon would receive a new trial.
The day he was finally heard
This time, with attorney Fred Turner, everything changed. He exposed flaws, dismantled the main witness, showed inconsistencies that had previously gone unnoticed.
On August 5, 1963, the same courtroom, the same judge, the same defendant—but now with a defense—heard a completely different verdict:
Not guilty.
After two years behind bars for a crime he did not commit, Gideon walked free.
A legacy greater than his own life
Gideon returned to a simple life, marked by health problems and a fifth marriage. He died in 1972, poor, initially buried in an unmarked grave.
Years later, he received a headstone from the ACLU with the words he himself had written to Fortas:
> “Each era finds an improvement in the law for the benefit of mankind.”
Today, whenever a judge says:
> “If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you,”
those words exist because a poor man, in a cell, refused to accept injustice as destiny.
The power of a single voice
The story of Clarence Earl Gideon reminds us of a profound truth:
It is not always the powerful who change the world.
Sometimes it is someone invisible.
Someone ignored.
Someone whose letters tremble on the page—
but whose conviction remains firm.
A man who picked up a short pencil and wrote:
> “This is not right.”
And the world, at last, agreed.
https://www.facebook.com/share/1CC7rTnmuA/
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário