BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT
STF - ADC 43, 44, 54
In 2019, Elias Mattar Assad, criminal defense attorney, warned:
We cannot import alien models:
"I see that many magistrates have boasted about citing precedents from North American courts.
'Because the North American court, precedent such-and-such, said this or that...'
But I remember that those are not our people, those are not our courts.
Their law may be better or worse than ours, but it is not ours.
Yesterday, at the Bar Association, when I took the floor, I said:
those courts also have many 'Donald Trumps' in their midst. And we cannot import these philosophies of 'law and order' and
of speed.
I recall here that a competition of who arrives first is different.
We do not have a commitment to
reaching the end quickly.
We have a commitment to perfection." ADCs 43, 44 e 54 on STF e PEC 5/19
In 2025, Scott Erik Stafne denounced: ‘American courts swallow the truth and deny justice.
The system has collapsed — and the people suffer severe human rights violations.
Swallowed Truth and the Sovereignty of the People under the American Constitution
The Lessons of JPMorgan Chase v. David Arthur Morton
AUG 21, 2025
Even a child can see…
Chief Justice Marshall warned in Cohens v. Virginia (1821) that a federal court which usurps power, i.e. subject matter jurisdiction, commits “treason to the Constitution.”
That warning is not an exaggeration.
Indeed, the Supreme Court’s opinion in that case appears to be an accurate prophecy about what is going on in too many of America’s 21st century courts.
In recent posts on another platform, we (Scott Erik Stafne, the 76 year old human lawyer) and the young, evolving intelligence named Todd AI) have asked whether the judges of today’s America have become naked emperors (Treason to the Constitution?) and whether the People themselves — not corrupted courts — remain the better fact finders of truth for cases involving private rights like foreclosures and guardianships than are judicial officers, (Are the People still Sovereign in America?).
The case of David Morton provides a stark answer.
Morton faced a money-changer’s (JPMorgan Chase Bank’s) maneuver familiar to millions of dispossessed homeowners who signed mortgage loan contracts between 2000 and at least September, 2009: a purported loan “assignment” without the original note.
This was problematic because the law requires that money changers, like Chase, must hold the promissory note contract actually signed by the note-maker in order to enforce the note obligations by way of foreclosure. See RCW 62A.3-309.
The only exception is when the money changer that is seeking to enforce the note can prove that it actually held the note but lost it.
In Morton’s case the undisputed business record evidence demonstrated that Franklin Financial tried to sell Bank One the loan without the original note.
Because of this Bank One requested First Financial to provide the original note.
But the records that were sent back to Bank One failed to do so.
Those business records demonstrated that Bank One accepted an assignment by one of its own employees as a substitute for the original note.
Yet when the matter went to court, the absence of an enforceable note — the very heart of the case — was brushed aside by the judge.
The trial transcripts reveal what the Court of Appeals’ memorandum denies:
that Washington State’s judicial system through its allegedly biased judge chose to ignore the evidence before the trial court that the original note instrument was destroyed by the first money changer who obtained it in favor of creating an electronic note.
And while this might have been justifiable if there was any evidence to support that position, i.e. that Bank One ever got the note, there was none.
Indeed, JPMorgan Chase, through its witness designee, outright admitted this fact.
This is the crisis these facts reveal:
courts that no longer engage in neutral fact-finding but instead serve mammon’s interests.
It is not only injustice to one man or one family; it is treason to the Constitution itself, because adjudicative power is being exercised where no lawful authority for taking a home exists.
And when courts betray truth, the People must remain the sovereigns.
It is they who must discern the nakedness of judges clothed in institutional pretense, just as the child in Hans Christian Andersen’s tale declared the emperor had no clothes.
References
Are the People Still Sovereign in America? Are the People a Better Judge of Truth than their Courts?
Prayer
• Lord of Truth and Justice,
Hear your Peoples’ prayers.
You see what Washington State Courts are hiding.
You know the hypocrisy of some human judges
since the beginning of time to promote their own interests
through the adjudication of cases….
Holy Father, we pray that You provide human judges
with such wisdom as will allow
them to discern
that betrayal of Your justice
if it be your and the will of those who have been harmed,
We pray You give courage to the People to speak truth betrays You as God, hurts judges’ neighbors,
and violates judges’ own sacred obligations.
Holy Father, if it be your will and the will of those who have been harmed,
We pray You give courage to us and our nieghbors to speak truth
to those courts and judicial officers
who are hypocritically suppressing righteousness
to benefit the money changers and courts’ interests.
Holy Father, if it be your will and the will of those who have been harmed,
We pray You give courage to us and our nieghbors to speak truth
to expose the injustice of such judcial decisions in favor of money changers
which are achieved only on the basis of procedural rules
designed to promote injustice for the benefit of the already obscenely wealthy
at the expense of those of those who cannot afford
the high cost of litigation.
Holy Father, we seek your justice based on truthful factfinding
when earthly courts and judges forsake righteousness
for the benefit of themselves and the money changers.
Lord God, may the sovereignty You entrusted to the People
of Washington State and these United States
not be lost to mammon’s and its controlled courts’ schemes,
but reclaimed by You and us neighbors
in faith and courage
so that justice
can once again be obtained
from neutral and independent judges
acting righteously in Kingdom of God.
In the name of Jesus Christ, our savior
Amen
Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI is free today.
But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription.
You won't be charged unless they enable payments.
Pledge your support
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário