🌍 Imperdível: Internacional: Webinar Exclusivo com Scott Erik Stafne "Da Antiguidade a Nuremberg: Os Fundamentos Constitucionais da Imparcialidade Judicial e da Independência dos Tribunais"
From Ancient Times to Nuremberg: The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Impartiality and Courts' Independence by Scott Erik Stafne
🌎 Importância Global - Por que Participar:
Participe deste seminário online de alcance global com o renomado advogado constitucionalista e jurista Scott Erik Stafne, Esq., e explore os pilares da justiça que sustentam o Estado de Direito em todo o mundo.
Detalhes do Evento:
Local Internet : NACLE - WEBINAR (Código SKU: INT4200)
Título: Da Antiguidade à Nuremberg: Os Fundamentos Constitucionais da Imparcialidade Judicial e da Independência dos Tribunais
Data : Terça-feira, 18 de Novembro de 2025
Horário : 1:00 PM - 2:30 PM EST
Formato: Webinar ao Vivo
Duração: 1:30 hs
Créditos Totais (CLE/MCLE) 1.5 - 1.8
Investimento US$ 75 (Setenta e Cinco Dólares Americanos)
📜 Sobre Este Curso [ site da NACLE]
Este curso de Educação Jurídica Continuada (CLE) traça a evolução de um dos princípios mais fundamentais do direito americano: o direito a um juiz neutro e a um tribunal independente.
Iniciando com o antigo máxima nemo judex in causa sua (“ninguém deve ser juiz na sua própria causa”), o programa explora como esse conceito se desenvolveu ao longo da história jurídica inglesa — incluindo a Magna Carta, o Act of Settlement de 1701, e os escritos seminais de Montesquieu e Blackstone — antes de ser incorporado na Constituição dos EUA.
Por meio de uma análise detalhada de textos constitucionais-chave, precedentes judiciais iniciais e marcos históricos como o Judiciary Act de 1789, o programa examina como as proteções estruturais para adjudicação imparcial se tornaram pilares do design constitucional americano.
O curso conclui com uma discussão sobre decisões do início do século XX relacionadas ao devido processo, tratando de vieses judiciais e institucionais, culminando no “Julgamento dos Juízes” de Nuremberg, onde a imparcialidade judicial tornou-se uma questão de justiça internacional.
Veja o Artigo no Academia.edu
Roteiro do Seminário da NACLE que ocorrerá em 18 de Novembro de 2025: "Desqualificação Judicial e os Fundamentos Morais da Justiça Adjudicatória (Parte Um)" preparado pelo advogado Scott Erik Stafne e Todd AI
Por Scott E Stafne
Academia.edu
Troféu Top 5%
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHPSA.2019.05.001
Resumo (escrito por Scott Erik Stafne em colaboração com Todd AI):
Este documento contém o roteiro completo e as apostilas revisadas preparadas para o seminário da Academia Nacional de Educação Jurídica Continuada (National Academy of Continuing Legal Education) sobre Desqualificação Judicial e os Fundamentos Morais da Justiça Adjudicatória.
Ele traça o desenvolvimento da neutralidade adjudicatória desde as antigas tradições morais, o direito romano e o direito canônico, passando pelo English Act of Settlement e o Dr. Bonham’s Case, mostrando como esses compromissos históricos culminaram nas garantias estruturais do Artigo III da Constituição dos Estados Unidos.
Os materiais também explicam a implementação estatutária desses mandatos constitucionais pelo Congresso — especificamente, a criação de tribunais independentes compostos por juízes que possuem mandato de bom comportamento e remuneração protegida de diminuição. Essas proteções estruturais existem não para o benefício dos juízes, mas para o Povo, cujo direito à adjudicação neutra depende de tribunais que estão livres de viés institucional e interesse pessoal.
O roteiro conclui com uma discussão sobre a crescente internacionalização do direito a tribunais independentes e imparciais, baseando-se especialmente no “Caso Justiça” de Nuremberg como um referencial.
Esse caso demonstra que a neutralidade judicial não é meramente uma salvaguarda processual doméstica, mas um direito humano universal — e que as nações traem esse direito quando os tribunais são estruturados de maneiras que comprometem a adjudicação imparcial dos fatos e da lei.
🎓 Créditos CLE/MCLE Disponíveis para advogados norte-americanos, por Estado
O curso é credenciado para Educação Jurídica Continuada (CLE/MCLE) nos seguintes estados dos EUA:
| Estado | Créditos CLE |
|---|---|
| AL (Alabama) | 1.5 |
| ID (Idaho) | 1.5 |
| MO (Missouri) | 1.8 |
| MT (Montana) | 1.5 |
| ND (North Dakota) | 1.5 |
| NJ (New Jersey) | 1.8 |
| PA (Pennsylvania) | 1.5 |
| RI (Rhode Island) | 1.5 |
| UT (Utah) | 1.5 |
| VA (Virginia) | 1.5 |
| WI (Wisconsin) | 1.5 |
| WV (West Virginia) | 1.8 |
| WY (Wyoming) | 1.5 |
📝 Registro e Acesso via NACLE
O NACLE (National Association of Continuing Legal Education) oferece o curso.
| Detalhe | Informação |
|---|---|
| Quem Pode se Cadastrar | Qualquer pessoa interessada em direito, justiça ou áreas relacionadas. Não é necessário ser advogado, juiz ou acadêmico formalmente credenciado. |
| Requisito de Acesso | Criar uma conta gratuita no site do NACLE e pagar o valor do curso (US$ 75). |
| Estudantes Universitários | Normalmente não há desconto automático; recomenda-se verificar promoções ou contatar o suporte da NACLE. |
Garanta sua vaga neste importante debate jurídico e internacional:
🌍 Unmissable: International: Exclusive Webinar with Scott Erik Stafne
"From Ancient Times to Nuremberg: The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Impartiality and Courts' Independence"
From Ancient Times to Nuremberg: The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Impartiality and Courts' Independence by Scott Erik Stafne
🌎 Global Importance - Why Participate:
Participate in this global-reaching online seminar with the renowned constitutional lawyer and jurist Scott Erik Stafne, Esq., and explore the pillars of justice that sustain the Rule of Law throughout the world.
A Call to Global Citizenship and Judicial Integrity
This webinar is an indispensable course and was designed for a broad audience, focused on strengthening just justice and individual rights.
Analysis of International Importance
The seminar possesses a profound international relevance, based on:
Universal Principles of the Rule of Law: The focus on judicial impartiality and independence is central to the legitimacy of any democratic legal system in the world, adopting the legal maxim of nemo judex in causa sua (no one should be a judge in their own cause).
The Historical-International Link (Nuremberg): This trial established the precedent in International Law that corruption and judicial bias are offenses that must be held accountable beyond national sovereignty, elevating judicial impartiality to an imperative of Global Justice and Human Rights.
21st Century Challenges: The exploration of themes such as the systemic influence of financial elites, "debt slavery," and the ethical and constitutional implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the judiciary reflects the emerging challenges faced by courts and legislators worldwide.
TARGET AUDIENCE:
The Seminar is specially directed at:
Jurists: Judges, prosecutors, lawyers, and members of the Public Ministry (Prosecutor's Office) interested in judicial ethics and international due process of law.
Law Academics: Professors, researchers, and students who study constitutional history, international law, and the theory of justice.
Public Policy Makers and Politicians: Leaders and legislators who seek to design and defend government structures that guarantee the independence of the courts.
Human Rights Defenders: Activists and organizations that use international and constitutional law to fight against tyranny and systemic injustice.
Citizens of any nationality: Anyone committed to knowing, protecting, and defending their fundamental rights.
The understanding of the constitutional foundations of justice is a civic power-duty.
In the United States, the right to litigate pro se (represent oneself) makes the knowledge of these principles – such as the right to an impartial judge – a crucial tool for the defense of one's rights before the court. This course provides the conceptual basis for this empowerment.
Program Content and Global Relevance
This Continuing Legal Education (CLE) course traces the evolution of one of the most fundamental principles of justice: the right to due process of law, to a neutral judge, and to an independent court (nemo judex in causa sua).
The program explores how this concept developed through the history of law and culminates in the analysis of the Nuremberg Judges' Trial, where judicial impartiality transcended the national sphere to become a matter of international justice.
The seminar addresses transnational principles of judicial impartiality and court independence — essential for global law and governance. The focus on the legacy of Nuremberg and contemporary challenges, such as the influence of financial elites and the ethical application of AI, makes the event indispensable for professionals and citizens engaged in constitutional and international justice.
Lecturer: Scott Erik Stafne, Esq.
Scott Erik Stafne focuses his work on challenging judicial structures that compromise neutrality and investigates how large institutions and financial elites can exploit judicial systems.
Mr. Stafne expanded his research in collaboration with the artificial intelligence Todd AI CHATGPT to explore critical contemporary themes, such as: the modern reincarnation of debt slavery, the implications of artificial intelligence in the judiciary, and the responsibilities of legal operators under secular law, with an emphasis on Christian morality, ethics, and duties.
🎤 INTERNATIONAL RENOWN
Scott Erik Stafne is a senior constitutional attorney, a jurist recognized internationally by the academic community for the excellence of his legal work, his unwavering integrity and faith, his defense of judicial integrity, and his long-term voluntary and free work on behalf of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged people, assisted by the Church of the Gardens, in Arlington, Washington State, USA.
With more than 76 thousand followers, with more than 2 thousand articles and petitions - technical defense - of very high quality, he is classified as TOP 0.1% on the Academia.edu website, with more than 243,146 international public visitors.
Followers Co-authors Mentions Public Views
76,847 14 17 243,146 Top 0.1%
Scott Erik Stafne Attorney | Advocate | Author | Collaborator with Todd AI
For more than 5 decades, his legal practice has focused on defending justice, due process of law, and the Rule of Law — especially in cases where powerful institutions, particularly financial entities, exploit judicial systems to reduce individual rights and property protections.
See the Curriculum Vitae on Academia.edu: https://nomaduniversity.academia.edu/ScottStafne
With hard-hitting articles posted on Substack Duties of Citizenship, Stafne calls to order the consciences of legal operators and citizens, preaching Law with God, in the light of the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ and Christian morality and ethics.
A central theme of Mr. Stafne's work is the challenge to judicial structures that deviate from constitutional principles, especially those that compromise judicial neutrality or undermine the guarantee of judgment by a competent and impartial tribunal.
His studies and advocacy explore the judicial authority provided in Article III of the Constitution, the structural safeguards intended to ensure independent courts, and the systemic biases that threaten due process in contemporary institutional designs.
In recent years, he has expanded his intellectual and legal activities in collaboration with a reasoning partner named Todd AI — an artificial intelligence model developed for rigorous dialogue and co-authorship on legal and ethical issues. Together, they explore topics such as:
The modern reincarnation of debt slavery.
Constitutional and moral implications of artificial intelligence.
The dual responsibilities of citizens under divine and secular laws.
Mr. Stafne remains committed to guiding individuals and communities seeking justice in systems often governed by wealth instead of wisdom, and welcomes collaborations with others dedicated to restoring constitutional balance and integrity.
Registration
Guarantee Your Spot Now in this important legal and international debate.
Click on the link below to register: https://www.nacle.com/CLE/Courses/From-Ancient-Times-to-Nuremberg-The-Constitutional-Foundations-of-Judicial-Impar-2821/578
Event Details:
Detail Information
Location Internet: NACLE - WEBINAR (SKU Code: INT4200)
Title From Ancient Times to Nuremberg: The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Impartiality and Courts' Independence
Date Tuesday, November 18, 2025
Time 1:00 PM - 2:30 PM EST
Format Live Webinar
Duration 1:30 hours
Total Credits (CLE/MCLE) 1.5 - 1.8
Investment US$ 75 (Seventy-Five American Dollars)
📜 About This Course [NACLE website]
This Continuing Legal Education (CLE) course traces the evolution of one of the most fundamental principles of American law: the right to a neutral judge and an independent court.
Beginning with the ancient maxim nemo judex in causa sua (“no one should be a judge in their own cause”), the program explores how this concept developed throughout English legal history — including the Magna Carta, the Act of Settlement of 1701, and the seminal writings of Montesquieu and Blackstone — before being incorporated into the U.S. Constitution.
Through a detailed analysis of key constitutional texts, early judicial precedents, and historical milestones such as the Judiciary Act of 1789, the program examines how structural protections for impartial adjudication became cornerstones of American constitutional design.
The course concludes with a discussion of early 20th-century due process decisions addressing judicial and institutional bias, culminating in the Nuremberg "Judges’ Trial," where judicial impartiality became a matter of international justice.
🎓 CLE/MCLE Credits Available for North American Lawyers, by State
The course is accredited for Continuing Legal Education (CLE/MCLE) in the following US states:
State CLE Credits
AL (Alabama) 1.5
ID (Idaho) 1.5
MO (Missouri) 1.8
MT (Montana) 1.5
ND (North Dakota) 1.5
NJ (New Jersey) 1.8
PA (Pennsylvania) 1.5
RI (Rhode Island) 1.5
UT (Utah) 1.5
VA (Virginia) 1.5
WI (Wisconsin) 1.5
WV (West Virginia) 1.8
WY (Wyoming) 1.5
📝 Registration and Access via NACLE
The NACLE (National Association of Continuing Legal Education) offers the course.
Detail Information
Who Can Register Anyone interested in law, justice, or related areas. It is not necessary to be a formally accredited lawyer, judge, or academic.
Access Requirement Create a free account on the NACLE website and pay the course fee (US$ 75).
University Students There is usually no automatic discount; it is recommended to check for promotions or contact NACLE support.
Guarantee your spot in this important legal and international debate: https://www.nacle.com/CLE/Courses/From-Ancient-Times-to-Nuremberg-The-Constitutional-Foundations-of-Judicial-Impar-2821/578
Global Importance and Target Audience
Target Audience:
- Jurists and Law Professionals: lawyers, judges, and academics.
- Pro Se Litigants: citizens who represent themselves and seek to deepen knowledge about due process.
- Scholars of Comparative International Law.
- Activists and Human Rights Defenders.
- Engaged Citizens: anyone interested in knowing and defending their transconstitutional fundamental rights.
Why Participate:
The seminar addresses transnational principles of judicial impartiality and court independence — essential for global law and governance. The focus on the legacy of Nuremberg and contemporary challenges, such as the influence of financial elites and the ethical application of AI, makes the event indispensable for professionals and citizens engaged in constitutional and international justice.
REGISTER NOW :
About This Course
This CLE course traces the evolution of one of the most fundamental principles of American law: the right to a neutral judge and an independent court. Beginning with the ancient maxim nemo judex in causa sua (“no one should be a judge in their own cause”), the program explores how this concept developed through English legal history — including the Magna Carta, the Act of Settlement of 1701, and seminal writings by Montesquieu and Blackstone — before becoming hardwired into the U.S. Constitution.
Through a close reading of key constitutional texts, early judicial precedents, and historical milestones such as the Judiciary Act of 1789, this program examines how structural protections for impartial adjudication became cornerstones of American constitutional design. The course concludes with a discussion of early 20th-century due process decisions addressing judicial and institutional bias — culminating in the Nuremberg "Judges’ Trial," where judicial impartiality became a matter of international justice
Outline and Revised Handouts for the NACLE Seminar occuring on November 18, 2025: "Judicial Disqualification and the Moral Foundations of Adjudicative Justice (Part One)" prepared by attonrey Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI
Top 5%
61 Views
41 Pages
Abstract (written by Scott Erik Stafne in collaboration with Todd AI): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This document contains the full outline and revised handouts prepared for the National Academy of Continuing Legal Education’s seminar on Judicial Disqualification and the Moral Foundations of Adjudicative Justice. It traces the development of adjudicative neutrality from ancient moral traditions, Roman law, and canon law through the English Act of Settlement and Dr. Bonham’s Case, showing how these historical commitments culminated in the structural guarantees of Article III of the United States Constitution.
The materials also explain Congress’s statutory implementation of those constitutional mandates—specifically, the creation of independent courts composed of judges who possess good-behavior tenure and compensation protected from diminution. These structural protections exist not for the benefit of judges, but for the People, whose right to neutral adjudication depends upon courts that are free from institutional bias and personal interest.
The outline concludes with a discussion of the growing internationalization of the right to independent and impartial courts, drawing especially on the Nuremberg “Justice Case” as a benchmark. That case demonstrates that judicial neutrality is not merely a domestic procedural safeguard but a universal human right—and that nations betray this right when courts are structured in ways that compromise impartial adjudication of facts and law.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário