MINDD – DEFENSE OF RIGHTS DENOUNCES
The political and institutional persecution against the lawyers of the victims of foreclosure frauds, of the denial of the natural judge and of due process of law, of financial abuses, of forged proceedings—null and void ab initio due to the direct affront to the fundamental principles of the Democratic State under the Rule of Law—and of judicial corruption in the courts of the United States of America, especially in fraudulent mortgage foreclosures and also in guardianship and family court proceedings, has reached unimaginable levels in a country that calls itself a DEMOCRATIC STATE UNDER THE RULE OF LAW.
In addition to the atrocities committed covertly, both inside and outside the courts, the persecution waged against lawyers—by those who, in theory and under the law, should punish the lawyers responsible for abuses and defend the Constitution and the advocates who dare to denounce corruption, in accordance with the guiding principles of judicial conduct and the duties and oath of the legal profession—causes astonishment and indignation to any decent person who has even the slightest knowledge of the truth of the facts.
From north to south, from east to west, elderly people, women, family fathers, relatives, psychiatrists, and honorable lawyers raise their voices, hoping to be heard.
However, what is observed is the political capture of institutions and bar associations that literally prevent access to fair justice, according to the numerous complaints received and the documentation presented and analyzed.
The lawyer is indispensable to the Administration of Justice and to the defense of the Democratic State under the Rule of Law.
The impeccable defense of Scott Erik Stafne is aligned with the two pillars of the Democratic State under the Rule of Law enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America, with legal doctrine, and with international human rights treaties
Read the comparative and reasoned legal analysis of the Constitutional Doctrine defended by Stafne:
Read also
MINDD - DEFENDA SEUS DIREITOS: THE PEOPLE’S STRUGGLE AGAINST JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN THE UNITED STATES AND BRAZIL When Charity Grows Cold and Justice Falls Silent
https://vitimasfalsoscondominios.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-peoples-struggle-against-judicial.html
INVIOLABILITY OF THE LAWYER : STF Lawyers have the right to question sentences STF: Advogados têm o direito de questionar sentenças
https://vitimasfalsoscondominios.blogspot.com/2025/10/inviolability-of-lawyer-stf-lawyers.html
BEYOND JURISDICTION: ULTRA VIRES FORECLOSURES IN WASHINGTON STATE: AN INTERNATIONAL STUDY OF VOID AB INITIO ACTS AND QUERELA NULITATIS INSANABILIS
When the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) closes its eyes and ears to all the complaints and petitions of the victims of severe violence and human rights violations, and persecutes and punishes the lawyers who defend them, this is not an individual problem—it is a matter of public law and general repercussion.
See, for instance, the paradigmatic case of the disciplinary administrative proceeding improperly initiated by the WSBA against the People’s Lawyer – SCOTT ERIK STAFNE.
This is evident retaliation against one who dares to defend the Constitutional Doctrine of the Founding Fathers of the Nation and the inalienable human rights of the American people.
We are following the developments of this case, in which manipulations within the administrative process—including the removal, without just cause and without any explanation, of the initially designated rapporteur—raise serious doubts about the real political interests involved.
A perseguição política e institucional contra os advogados das vítimas das fraudes nas foreclosures, da negativa ao juiz natural e ao devido legal, dos abusos financeiros, dos processos forjados, nulos de pleno direito desde a instauração, em razão da afronta direta aos pdenuncis rincípios basilares do Estado Democrático de Direito, da corrupção judicial, nos tribunais dos Estados Unidos da América do Norte , especialmente nas execuções fraudulentas de hipotecas - foreclosures- e tambem em processos de interdição de idosos,,guardianship, e nas varas de família, atingiu patamares inimagináveis em um país que se diz DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO.
Além das atrocidades praticadas às ocultas, nos tribunais e fora deles, a perseguição movida contra os advogados, por aqueles que, em tese, e na forma das leis, deveriam punir os advogados responsáveis pelos abusos, e defender a Constituição e os advogados que ousam denunciar a corrupção, de conformidade com os princípios norteadores da conduta judicial e os deveres e juramento dos advogados, causa espanto e indignação a qualquer pessoa de bem, que tenha o mais mínimo conhecimento da verdade dos fatos.
De norte a sul, de leste a oeste, idosos, mulheres, pais de família, familiares, psiquiatras, e advogados dignos, erguem suas vozes, na esperança de que sejam ouvidos.
Porém, o que se constata, é o aparelhamento político das instituições e das associações de advogados, que , literalmente impedem o acesso àjustiçaJUSTA, segundo as inumeras denúncias recebidas e a documentação apresentada, e analisada.
O advogado é indispensável à Administração da Justiça e à defesa do Estado Democrático de Direito.
A defesa impecável de Scott Erik Stafne está alinhada com os dois formadores do Estado Democrático de Direito insculpidos na Constituição dos Estados Unidos da América do Norte, com a doutrina e com com os Tratados internacionais de direitos humanos.
Leiam a análise jurídica comparada e fundamentada da DOUTRINA DA DOUTRINA CONSTITUCIONAL defendida por Stafne.
Quando a WS BAR fecha os olhos, e ouvidos, à todas as denuncias e pedidos das VÍTIMAS de gravíssimas violências e violação de direitos humanos e persegue e pune os advogados que as defendem, esse não é um problema individual, é um problema de DIREITO PUBLICO e REPERCUSSÃO GERAL.
Veja-se, o caso paradigmático do processo administrativo disciplinar INDEVIDAMENTE instaurado pela WS BAR contra o ADVOGADO DO POVO - SCOTT ERIK STAFNE.
Trata-se de uma evidente retaliação praticada contra aquele que OUSA DEFENDER A DOUTRINA CONSTITUCIONAL dos PAIS FUNDADORES da Pátria e os direitos humanos indisponíveis do povo norte-americano.
Estamos acompanhando a evolução deste caso, onde as manipulações do processo administrativo, incluindo a remoção, sem justa causa e sem qualquer explicação, do relator inicialmente indicado, levanta sérias dúvidas sobre os reais interesses políticos envolvidos.
Washington State Bar Association – In re Scott Erik Stafne, ODC file No. 24-01379 – Notice to Bar Association and its officials of Stafne’s Petition for Redress filed with the Congress
By Scott E. Stafne
visibility: 84 Views
description: 4 Pages
categories: Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Courts, First Amendment Law (USA), International Human Rights Law
Read full document on Academia.edu
Washington ton State Bar Association - In re Scott Erik Stafne, ODC file No. 24-01379 - Notice to Bar Association and its officials of Stafne's Petition for Redress filed with the Congress
By Scott E Stafne
visibility
84 Views
description
4 Pages
link
1 File ▾
sell
Constitutional Law,
Human Rights Law,
Courts,
First Amendment Law (USA),
International Human Rights Law
Show more
I write to address critical constitutional issues raised by the Washington State Bar Association’s (Bar) actions by private individuals taken under color of state law against me, both before and after the filing of my Petition for Redress with Congress. These actions, described below, infringe upon my constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, specifically my right to petition the government for redress and to due process.
LETTER FROM SCOTT ERIK STAFNE
November 20, 2024
Washington State Bar Association
Office of Disciplinary Counsel and others 1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 600
Seattle, WA 98101-2539
Via email submissions to: intake@wsba.org, questions@wsba.org, dianas@wsba.org, and accommodations@wsba.org.
Re: ODC File No. 24-01379: In re Scott Erik Stafne, WSBA #6964
To whom it may concern:
I write to address critical constitutional issues raised by the Washington State Bar Association’s (Bar) actions by private individuals taken under color of state law against me, both before and after the filing of my Petition for Redress with Congress1. These actions, described below, infringe upon my constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, specifically my right to petition the government for redress and to due process.
Pre-Petition Violations of My Rights
On August 12, 2024, I formally requested ethical guidance from the Bar regarding my legal and constitutional obligations in addressing
1 A copy of the Petition for Redress I filed with the United States Congress and copied to President Elect Trump, Chief Justice Roberts, and others can be accessed at:
https://www.academia.edu/122820275/Stafnes_Letter_to_the_Washington_State_Bar_Associatio n_seeking_written_ethical_guidance_as_to_how_handle_his_judgment_that_the_judicial_officers
_of_Washington_are_biased_and_not_independent_with_regards_to_cases_brought_by_succes sors_and_assigns_of_mortgages_to_foreclose_promissory_notes
concerns related to judicial authority and misconduct. Despite its mandate to provide such guidance, the Bar refused to evaluate the constitutional and statutory issues I raised, thereby obstructing my ability to discharge my professional responsibilities.
Instead, the Bar initiated an investigation against me based on retaliatory claims by Senior Judge Robart, asserting that he and senior judges Lasnik, Coughenouer, and Zilly possess good behavior tenure under Article III, when the statutory and constitutional provisions clearly indicate otherwise. Had the Bar conducted even a cursory review of these provisions, it would have recognized the merit of my concerns. This failure not only reflects a dereliction of the Bar’s duty but also constitutes a violation of my due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Post-Petition Retaliation and Violations of the Petition Clause
On November 19, 2024, I exercised my constitutional right under the First Amendment to petition Congress for redress of grievances concerning judicial misconduct and systemic constitutional violations in and by the United States District Court for Western Washington, and senior judges Robart, Lasnik, Coughenouer, and Zilly. My Petition for Redress, now pending before Congress, raises issues that fall squarely within Congress’s oversight authority under the separation of powers doctrine.
Despite this, the Bar continues its inappropriate investigation into my conduct, effectively retaliating against me for exercising my First Amendment rights. This investigation:
● Interferes with Congress’s exclusive authority to address the grievances outlined in my Petition, undermining the legislative process.
● Chills the exercise of First Amendment rights by creating a precedent that discourages other attorneys from raising constitutional concerns about judicial misconduct or systemic abuses.
The Bar’s actions place it in direct conflict with the Petition Clause, which ensures the right to seek redress from Congress without fear of retaliation or interference.
The Constitutional Stakes:
The Bar’s actions—both before and after the filing of my Petition—entrench judicial misconduct by targeting an attorney seeking to uphold constitutional principles. This undermines not only my individual rights but also the broader public interest in ensuring judicial accountability. The chilling effect of the Bar’s retaliatory actions extends beyond my case, discouraging others from advocating for necessary systemic reforms.
The Framers of the Constitution recognized the critical role of the Petition Clause in safeguarding public accountability, particularly in addressing government overreach or misconduct. By continuing its investigation, the Bar infringes upon this constitutional protection and interferes with Congress’s ability to fulfill its oversight responsibilities.
Formal Request for Action:
In light of these violations, I respectfully request that the Bar:
1. Immediately cease its investigation into my conduct, as it constitutes unconstitutional retaliation for my exercise of First Amendment rights.
2. Provide a formal explanation for its refusal to offer ethical guidance on the constitutional issues I raised in my August 12, 2024 request.
3. Commit to upholding its duty to fairly and impartially evaluate constitutional grievances raised by its members.
I reserve all rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to seek remedies for these violations, which have caused significant harm to my professional reputation and eroded public confidence in the legal profession. I urge the Bar to reconsider its actions and realign its practices with the constitutional principles it is sworn to uphold.
Furthermore, I assert that the foreclosures carried out by Washington State courts and judges—both state and federal—in favor of successors and assigns of mortgages bear striking resemblance to the kind of systemic overreach and
government-enabled theft that our Nation’s founders identified as grounds for declaring independence. Such actions betray the public trust and violate the constitutional safeguards that were established to prevent precisely these kinds of abuses.
As I write this, I face the very real possibility of losing both my office and my home next month—an outcome directly tied to the very judicial failures I have sought to expose and remedy, without reasonable compensation for my efforts.
This personal reality underscores the urgency of these issues—not just for me, but for countless others who depend on an impartial judiciary to deliver justice with integrity.
This is not simply my struggle; it is a broader indictment of a system that increasingly serves the interests of false creditors over the rights of the people. When our courts abdicate their responsibility to uphold the rule of law, they fail not only the individuals before them but also the foundational principles of our democracy.
Sincerely,
s/ Scott Erik Stafne
Scott E. Stafne
Attorney at Law WSBA 6964
https://www.academia.edu/125720868/Washington_State_Bar_Association_In_re_Scott_Erik_Stafne_ODC_file_No_24_01379_Notice_to_Bar_Association_and_its_officials_of_Stafnes_Petition_for_Redress_filed_with_the_Congress?source=swp_share
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário