THE TIRELESS STRUGGLE OF SCOTT ERIK STAFNE FOR JUSTICE: Pierce County Washington Superior Court - Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, in Trust for Registered Holders of Long Beach Mortgage Trust 2006-5 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-5 v Alvin White et al - White's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims, and Cross Claims

Pierce County Washington Superior Court - Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, in Trust for Registered Holders of Long Beach Mortgage Trust 2006-5 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-5 v Alvin White et al - White's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims, and Cross Claims

By Scott E Stafne

Constitutional Law,

Human Rights Law,

International Law,

Property Rights,

Property Law,

Political Science,

Governance,

Federalism,

Property,

Judicial review,

Judicial independence,

Judicial Politics,

Jurisdiction,

Judicial Decision-Making,

The role of the judiciary,

Separation of Powers,

Subprime crisis,

Wrongful Foreclosure,

Transfer of Property Law

Abstract This pleading presentation documents an answer, affirmative defenses, and challenges to eviction proceedings that followed trustee’s sales conducted after federal judicial involvement affecting the White’s and his tenants' property rights. It raises structural constitutional questions concerning private real property rights under state law based on federalism and the lawful exercise of judicial power affecting the real property located in states under Article III of the United States Constitution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Federalism requires that federal courts exercise authority only within the jurisdiction granted to them, particularly when adjudicating rights arising under state property law. This pleading asserts that federal judicial action affecting the defendant’s property occurred without proper adjudication of jurisdictional authority, thereby implicating fundamental constitutional protections. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< This presentation offers a concrete example of how federalism operates not as an abstract doctrine, but as a safeguard protecting citizens from the exercise of governmental power (both federal and state) beyond constitutional limits. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thid pleading was submitted to the Pierce County Superior Court for filing on February 19, 2026, but as of today (February 21, 2026) has not been filed.

Read on Academia.edu 

Tradução :

Resumo 

Esta apresentação de peça processual documenta uma contestação, defesas afirmativas e desafios a processos de despejo que se seguiram a vendas de fiduciários conduzidas após o envolvimento judicial federal que afetou os direitos de propriedade de White e de seus inquilinos. Levanta questões constitucionais estruturais relativas aos direitos de propriedade privada imobiliária sob a lei estadual, baseadas no federalismo e no exercício legal do poder judicial que afeta bens imóveis localizados nos estados, nos termos do Artigo III da Constituição dos Estados Unidos.

O federalismo exige que os tribunais federais exerçam autoridade apenas dentro da jurisdição que lhes foi concedida, particularmente ao adjudicar direitos decorrentes da lei de propriedade estadual. Esta petição afirma que a ação judicial federal que afetou a propriedade do réu ocorreu sem a devida adjudicação da autoridade jurisdicional, implicando, assim, proteções constitucionais fundamentais.

Esta apresentação oferece um exemplo concreto de como o federalismo opera não como uma doutrina abstrata, mas como uma salvaguarda que protege os cidadãos contra o exercício do poder governamental (tanto federal quanto estadual) além dos limites constitucionais.

Esta petição foi submetida ao Tribunal Superior do Condado de Pierce para arquivamento em 19 de fevereiro de 2026, mas até hoje (21 de fevereiro de 2026) não foi protocolada.

https://www.academia.edu/164798332/Pierce_County_Washington_Superior_Court_Deutsche_Bank_National_Trust_Company_as_Trustee_in_Trust_for_Registered_Holders_of_Long_Beach_Mortgage_Trust_2006_5_Asset_Backed_Certificates_Series_2006_5_v_Alvin_White_et_al_Whites_Answer_Affirmative_Defenses_Counterclaims_and_Cross_Claims?source=swp_share