MINDD - ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE DEFESA DAS VITIMAS DOS FALSOS CONDOMINIOS - 13.06.2008 A 13.06.2025- 18
ANOS DE GRANDES VITORIAS FALSE CONDOMINIUMS´s VICTIMS Community- A non-profit organisation focusing on Human Rights issues around the world, with particular focus on BRAZIL - DESDE 2008 AJUDANDO A DEFENDER A DEMOCRACIA E DIREITOS HUMANOS NO BRASIL - email : mindd.defesa.de.direitos@gmail.com
"How to Stand Before a Tribunal That You Believe has a Judge who not Properly Competent Because he or she is Corrupt, or dependent, or Inappropriately Biased. by Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI
Dec 3, 2025
A Crise da Independência Judicial e o Alerta para o Brasil
⚖ Foundational Report: The Crisis of Judicial Independence and the Warning for Brazil
The submitted text, which includes a quote from Minister Eros Grau and an article by Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI, is not just an outburst; it is a legal-constitutional alert that demands the attention of Brazilian institutions and society as a whole. The analysis focuses on the independence and impartiality of the Judiciary, an irreplaceable pillar of democracy.
I. The Importance of the Quote: Law as Prudence
The phrase by Minister Eros Grau — "O direito é uma prudência, não uma arte. O juiz está lá para aplicar a Constituição" ("The Law is a prudence, not an art. The judge is there to apply the Constitution") — provides the philosophical and legal basis for the entire discussion:
● Law as Prudence: Implies that the application of law is not an exercise in artistic creation (subjective or arbitrary), but in ethical-practical discernment (prudence). The judge must act with caution and moderation, seeking what is just in the concrete case, but always bound by the norm.
● Application of the Constitution: The judge is the guardian and executor of the Constitution. This means their primary function is to guarantee Fundamental Precepts, such as Due Process of Law, the Natural Judge, and Full Defense. When the judge deviates from the Constitution, they deviate from their own legitimacy.
The denouncement in the article by Stafne and Todd AI suggests that, in certain American jurisdictions, law has been treated as "art" (arbitrary and partial), and the judge has ceased to be the applier of the Constitution
.
II. The Article's Warning: The Destruction of Legitimate Judicial Process
The article questions: "What Should Litigants Do When They Believe the Courts Judging Them Are Not Independent?"
The essence of the denouncement is the lack of structural legitimacy of some US courts, described as:
1. Absence of Neutrality and Impartiality: The judge has a personal interest or the court is controlled by private or governmental interests.
2. Structural Incompetence: The court is structurally incapable of deciding justly, as it is "entangled" in the conflict, rather than being above it.
3. Violations of Due Process: Cases of denial of judicial relief, total defense curtailment, validation of false documents, and manifest partiality, culminating in "Teratological Decisions" (grotesque, manifestly illegal).
The step-by-step approach proposed by Stafne (documenting the structural defect, invoking the Superior Law, appealing to the public record, and persisting without hate) is a defense strategy that is only justified when internal correction mechanisms (such as impediment/recusal) structurally fail.
III. WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR EVERYONE (Focus on Citizenship and the Rule of Law)
The issue of the independence and impartiality of the Judiciary is not just a problem for lawyers or jurists; it is the core of the social, economic, and political stability of a country.
1. 🛡 Guarantee of Fundamental Rights (Legal Security)
The independent Judiciary is the last and main guardian of individual rights against the abuse of power (whether by the State or by major private powers).
● For the Common Citizen: If a judge is corrupt or partial, the individual loses the only chance of defense in crucial cases, such as those cited: child custody (Family), loss of property (Foreclosure), or any high-impact dispute. The lack of an impartial, Natural Judge, pre-constituted destroys Legal Security and the belief in justice.
● The Violation of Due Process of Law: Due process of law and full defense are the protection structure for the citizen. When this structure is "totally" violated, the individual begins to live under the law of arbitrariness.
2. 💰 Economic and Social Impact (Trust)
The legitimacy of the Judiciary is fundamental for the economy and for social relations:
● Business and Investment: Companies and investors (national and foreign) only invest in countries where there is a guarantee that contracts will be honored and disputes will be resolved fairly and impartially. A Judiciary perceived as corrupt or dependent drives away investment, causing economic regression.
● Conflict and Violence: When people lose confidence in the courts' ability to resolve conflicts justly, the tendency is for citizens to seek solutions outside the law (vengeance, private justice, or revolt), escalating social conflict and violence. Justice is society's safety valve.
3. The Warning for Brazil (Importation of Models)
The most critical part of the Brazilian blog is the warning against the importation of an unconstitutional "model" under the pretext of "speediness."
● Brazil, despite its difficulties, has a legal framework (CF/88, LOMAN, CNJ, Corregedorias) that aims to limit arbitrariness and guarantee defense rights. The existence of institutions like the CNJ (National Council of Justice) and the DPU (Federal Public Defender's Office) acts as a system of checks and balances that the analysis finds lacking in the American examples.
● Procedural speediness, when pursued at the expense of impartiality or due process of law, is a "solution" that destroys the Rule of Law itself. The cost of a quick and unjust decision is the collapse of legitimacy. The struggle, as Stafne summarizes, is against the "destruction of the legitimate judicial process itself."
IV. Conclusion: The Struggle for Legitimacy
The Brazilian blog report and the article by Scott Erik Stafne act as an ethical mirror.
They remind us that judicial power does not emanate from the robe or the courthouse, but from the legitimacy granted by the people, on the condition that the judge is neutral, competent, and an applier of the Constitution.
The fight against judicial corruption and partiality is, therefore, a fight for the very survival of the Republic and the rights of every citizen.
IMPEACHMENT NOW !!!What Should Litigants Do When They Believe the Courts Judging Them Are Not Independent?
How to Stand Before a Tribunal That You Believe has a Judge who not Properly Competent Because he or she is Corrupt, or dependent, or Inappropriately Biased.
Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI
Dec 3
Opinion MINDD
"O DIREITO É UMA PRUDÊNCIA, NÃO UMA ARTE. O JUIZ ESTÁ LA PARA APLICAR A CONSTITUIÇÃO". MINISTRO EROS GRAU - STF
A tradução literal para o inglês da frase é:
"THE LAW IS A PRUDENCE, NOT AN ART. THE JUDGE IS THERE TO APPLY THE CONSTITUTION." MINISTER EROS GRAU - STF
Leia o artigo completo em português após a análise
"
⚖ The Crisis of Judicial Independence and the Warning for Brazil
OPINIÃO MINDD
A GENTE RECLAMA MUITO, E COM RAZÃO, MAS A SITUAÇÃO NOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMÉRICA DO NORTE É MUITO PIOR !!!!
AQUI TEMOS A LEI ORGANICA DA MAGISTRATURA, LOMAN, O CÓDIGO DE ETICA DA MAGISTRATURA, A RESOLUÇÃO 135/11 DO CNJ, UMA CONSTITUIÇÃO FEDERAL MODERNA E ABRANGENTE, QUE DEFINE A ESTRUTURA DOS TRES PODERES DA REPÚBLICA, OS PRECEITOS FUNDAMENTAIS, E ASSEGURA O DIREITO AO DEVIDO PROCESSO LEGAL, JUIZ NATURAL, IMPARCIAL, JUSTO, PRÉ-CONSTITUIDO NA FORMA DA LEI, AMPLA DEFESA E CONTRADITÓRIO, VEDAÇÃO AO JUIZO OU TRIBUNAL DE EXCEÇÃO, E A INADMISSIBILIDADE DE USO DE PROVAS ILÍCITAS, E TEMOS O CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA, E AS CORREGEDORIAS DOS TRIBUNAIS, O CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL, O CODIGO DE PROCESSO PENAL, E A LEI DE IMPROBIDADE ADMINISTRATIVA, O ESTATUTO DOS ADVOGADOS, CONSELHO FEDERAL DA ORDEM DOS ADVOGADOS, DEFENSORIA PUBLICA, MINISTERIO PÚBLICO OPERANTES.
NÃO QUERO DIZER QUE SEJA FACIL, NA PRÁTICA, OBTER O RECONHECIMENTO DO IMPEDIMENTO E/OU DA SUSPEIÇÃO DE MAGISTRADOS, E A INSTAURAÇÃO DE UM PROCEDIMENTO ADMINISTRATIVO DISCIPLINAR CONTRA JUIZES, PORQUE NÃO É.
MAS NADA QUE EU JA VI ACONTECER AQUI , - E EU JÁ VI MUITA COISA - CHEGA AOS PÉS DO QUE FAZEM DESCARADAMENTE NOS TRIBUNAIS DE WASHINGTON STATE NAS VARAS CIVEIS DE FORECLOSURES, DE GUARDIANSHIP, NAS VARAS DE FAMÍLIA, E EM OUTROS ESTADOS....
NADA SE COMPARA COM AS ABSURDIDADES, ABUSOS DE AUTORIDADE, NEGATIVA DE PRESTAÇÃO DA TUTELA JURISDICIONAL, OBSTRUÇÃO DO ACESSO À JUSTIÇA, TOTAL CERCEAMENTO DE DEFESA, VIOLAÇÃO DE DIREITO AO CONTRADITÓRIO, AO JUIZ NATURAL, CONVALIDAÇÃO DE DOCUMENTOS FLAGRANTEMENTE FALSOS OU ADULTERADOS, PARCIALIDADE MANIFESTA, TOTAL VIOLAÇÃO DO DEVIDO PROCESSO LEGAL, ARBITRARIEDADES MULTIPLICADAS, MANIPULAÇÕES ARDILOSAS DOS AUTOS, OBSTRUÇÃO DO ACESSO AO JUIZ POR PARTE DE CHEFES DE SERVENTIAS, E DE FUNCIONÁRIOS PÚBLICOS NÃO IDENTIFICADOS, EM DECISÕES TERATOLOGICAS, MANIFESTAMENTE CONTRARIAS A LITERAL DISPOSIÇÃO DA CONSTITUIÇÃO DO ESTADOS UNIDOS, DAS LEIS FEDERAIS E ESTADUAIS, E A TODAS AS PROVAS NOS AUTOS .
QUALQUER ADVOGADO BRASILEIRO FICARIA CHOCADO COM A SITUAÇÃO ENFRENTADA PELOS ADVOGADOS NORTE-AMERICANOS
ESSE ARTIGO DE SCOTT ERIK STAFNE É MAIS QUE UM AVISO, É UM ALERTA E UMA PROVA INCONSTESTAVEL DOS RISCOS QUE NÓS, BRASILEIROS, ESTAMOS CORRENDO, COM A IMPORTAÇÃO DESTE "MODELO" ABSOLUTAMENTE INCONSTITUCIONAL!
O CONSELHO FEDERAL DA ORDEM DOS ADVOGADOS DO BRASIL, A DEFENSORIA PUBLICA DA UNIÃO, O MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO E OS OUTROS LEGITIMADOS A EXERCER A FISCALIZAÇÃO E A DEFESA DO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO DEVEM ESTAR ATENTOS PARA EVITAR QUE A PRETEXTO DE "CELERIDADE", OU QUAISQUER OUTRO, OS PRECEITOS FUNDAMENTAIS SEJAM VIOLADOS, IRREMEDIÁVELMENTE, NEGANDO O ESTADO DE DIREITO E CAUSANDO IMENSO RETROCESSO SOCIAL, POLITICO, ECONÔMICO E JUDICIAL.
OPINION
WE COMPLAIN A LOT, AND WITH REASON, BUT THE SITUATION IN THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA IS MUCH WORSE!!!!
HERE WE HAVE THE ORGANIC LAW OF THE MAGISTRACY, LOMAN, THE CODE OF ETHICS OF THE MAGISTRACY, RESOLUTION 135 OF THE CNJ [National Council of Justice], A MODERN AND COMPREHENSIVE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, WHICH DEFINES THE STRUCTURE OF THE THREE POWERS OF THE REPUBLIC, THE FUNDAMENTAL PRECEPTS, AND GUARANTEES THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW, NATURAL,IMPARTIAL, JUST JUDGE, PRE-CONSTITUTED IN THE FORM OF LAW, FULL DEFENSE AND ADVERSARIAL PRINCIPLE, PROHIBITION OF EXCEPTIONAL COURT OR TRIBUNAL, AND THE INADMISSIBILITY OF USING ILLICIT EVIDENCE,
AND WE HAVE THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUSTICE, AND THE CORREGEDORIAS [Internal Affairs/Oversight Bodies] OF THE COURTS, THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE IMPROBITY LAW, THE STATUTEOF LAWYERS, FEDERAL COUNCIL OF THE ORDER OF LAWYERS (OAB), THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, WHICH IS LEGITIMATE TO APPEAL TO THE STF [Supreme Federal Court] FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE ELDERLY, WOMEN, VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE, THE HYPER-VULNERABLE AND THE NEEDY, A STATE BODY THAT DOES NOT EXIST IN THE USA, OPERATIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE.
I DON'T WANT TO SAY THAT IT IS EASY, IN PRACTICE, TO OBTAIN THE RECOGNITION OF THE IMPEDIMENT AND/OR SUSPICION [grounds for recusal] OF MAGISTRATES, AND THE INSTAURATION OF A DISCIPLINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AGAINST JUDGES, BECAUSE IT IS NOT.
BUT NOTHING THAT I HAVE ALREADY SEEN HAPPEN HERE, - AND I HAVE ALREADY SEEN A LOT OF THINGS - COMES CLOSE OF WHAT THEY DO SHAMELESSLY IN THE WASHINGTON STATE COURTS IN THE CIVIL FORECLOSURES COURTS, OF GUARDIANSHIP, IN THE FAMILY COURTS, AND IN OTHER STATES....
NOTHING COMPARES WITH THE ABSURDITIES, ABUSES OF AUTHORITY, DENIAL OF JUDICIAL RELIEF, OBSTRUCTION OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE, TOTAL DEFENSE CURTAILMENT, VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO THE ADVERSARIAL PRINCIPLE, TO THE NATURAL JUDGE, VALIDATION OF FLAGRANTLY FALSE OR ADULTERATED DOCUMENTS, MANIFEST PARTIALITY, TOTAL VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW, MULTIPLIED ARBITRARINESS, ARTFUL MANIPULATIONS OF THE RECORDS, OBSTRUCTION OF ACCESS TO THE JUDGE BY HEADS OF COURT CLERK'S OFFICES,AND UNIDENTIFIED PUBLIC OFFICIALS, IN TERATOLOGICAL DECISIONS [Monstrous/Grotesque Decisions], MANIFESTLY CONTRARY TO THE LITERAL PROVISION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS, AND ALL THEEVIDENCE IN THE RECORDS.
ANY BRAZILIAN LAWYER WOULD BE SHOCKED BY THE SITUATION FACED BY NORTH AMERICAN LAWYERS.
THIS ARTICLE BY SCOTT ERIK STAFNE IS MORE THAN A NOTICE, IT IS AN ALERT AND AN INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF OF THE RISKS THAT WE, BRAZILIANS, ARE RUNNING, WITH THE IMPORTATION OF THIS ABSOLUTELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL "MODEL"!
THE FEDERAL COUNCIL OF THE ORDER OF LAWYERS OF BRAZIL (OAB), THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE AND THE OTHER LEGITIMATE ENTITIES TO EXERCISE THE OVERSIGHT AND THE DEFENSE OF THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW MUST BE ATTENTIVE TO AVOID THAT, UNDER THE PRETEXT OF "SPEEDINESS", OR ANY OTHER, THE FUNDAMENTAL PRECEPTS ARE VIOLATED, IRREMEDIABLY, DENYING THE RULE OF LAW AND CAUSING IMMENSE SOCIAL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND JUDICIAL REGRESSION [Setback/Backward Step].
GEMINI AI ANALYSIS
Complete English Translation and Analysis
Here is the literal translation of your initial preliminary analysis and the subsequent analysis based on international treaties, combined into a single text.
1. Preliminary Analysis (Analysis of Content)
This is a vehement and passionate critique of the American judicial system (particularly in some states like Washington) and a warning against the adoption of its models in Brazil.
1.1. Tone and Perspective
● Tone: Extremely alarmed, passionate, and cautious. It uses strong language such as "MUCH WORSE," "SHAMELESSLY," "ABSURDITIES," "MULTIPLIED ARBITRARINESS," and "TERATOLOGICAL DECISIONS."
● Perspective: That of the Brazilian lawyer who, despite acknowledging internal flaws, perceives a dramatic contrast when analyzing the American system, which is viewed as an example of poor judicial practice.
1.2. Brazil vs. USA Contrast
Your central argument is based on the contrast between the two countries:
Aspect Brazilian System and American System
Legal Guarantees Possesses a robust legal framework (CF/88, LOMAN, CEJ, CPP/CPC, CNJ, Corregedorias) which ensures fundamental rights (Due Process of Law, Natural Judge, Adversarial Principle, etc.). Allegedly, these guarantees are systematically violated, especially in jurisdictions of states like Washington, in areas of Foreclosures, Guardianship, and Family.
Control Mechanisms Oversight mechanisms exist
(CNJ, Corregedorias, OAB, DPU, MP) and remedies
impediment/suspeição), which, though difficult, are operational. Stafne's article suggests a structural failure and the non-existence of a truly independent/neutral court, which renders the control mechanisms ineffective.
Level of Abuse Acknowledges problems ("complains a lot," "is not easy"), but states that nothing "comes close" to what happens in the USA.
Actions in the USA are described as "shameless," ranging from denial of justice and denial of defense to manipulation of records and "teratological" decisions.
1.3. Main Points of Criticism of the American Model
The core of your critique of the American system, mirroring the points raised by Scott Erik Stafne's article, is the systemic violation of basic tenets:
● Illegitimate Judge/Court: Lack of impartiality and neutrality (Manifest Partiality).
● Due Process of Law: Total violation (Total Violation of Due Process of Law).
● Access to Justice/Defense: Denial of jurisdictional protection, obstruction of access, and denial of defense (Obstruction of Access to Justice, Total Defense Curtailment).
● Procedural Integrity: Validation of false/adulterated documents and artful manipulation of records.
1.4. Final Warning and Recommendation
The most crucial point of your commentary is the warning (ALERT AND AN INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF):
● Risk: Brazil is running the risk of importing this American judicial "model," which you consider absolutely unconstitutional.
● Motivation for Importation: The importation could occur under the pretext of seeking "speediness" (of procedure).
● Necessary Action: Demands that oversight and defense institutions of the Democratic Rule of Law in Brazil (OAB, DPU, MP) be attentive to prevent this "immense regression" (setback) social, political, economic, and judicial.
2. 🏛 Analysis in Light of International Treaties and Bangalore Principles
The analysis of your comments regarding Scott Erik Stafne's article, viewed through the lens of International Treaties on Human, Political, and Social Rights and the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, reveals that the concerns raised directly align with violations of fundamental norms of international law.
2.1. International Treaties Context
Your text criticizes the alleged failure of the judicial system to guarantee basic rights. This echoes the central principles of several international treaties:
● International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):
○ Article 14 (1): This is the most relevant point. It guarantees that "everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law."
■ Your Critique: The mention of "manifest partiality," the absence of the "Natural Judge," and the functioning of courts "structurally incapable of deciding" (citing Stafne) directly violates the requirement for a competent, independent, and impartial tribunal.
○ Due Process and Defense: The allegations of "total denial of defense," "violation of the right to the adversarial principle," and "obstruction of access to justice" are direct violations of due process and the right to a full defense, guaranteed by Article 14.
● Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR):
○ Article 10: States that "Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations."
● International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR):
○ While your focus is procedural/political, the judiciary's failure to guarantee justice (especially in foreclosures and guardianship cases involving housing and family) has serious social and economic consequences, affecting the individual's capacity to enjoy their social rights.
2.2. Analysis of the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct
The Bangalore Principles (2002) are the fundamental international standard for judicial ethics.
Your criticisms of judicial practices in the US (and the warning about their potential importation) directly violate the six core values defined by these principles:
Bangalore Principle Your Violation Critique (Examples)
1. Independence The court is not "neutral" and is "controlled by private or governmental interests" (Stafne). The denouncement of the court's
"dependence" and "absence of independence".
2. Impartiality "Manifest partiality," the failure to recognize the "impediment and/or suspicion of magistrates" (grounds for recusal), and the refusal to guarantee a "natural, impartial, just judge".
3. Integrity "Artful manipulations of the records" and "validation of flagrantly false or adulterated documents" demonstrate the absence of an integral standard of conduct.
4. Propriety "Abuses of authority" and "multiplied arbitrariness" by magistrates and officials, suggesting a lack of propriety in the exercise of power.
5. Equality The "denial of defense" and "obstruction of access to justice" deny equality before the courts and the right to fair treatment.
6. Competence and Diligence "Denial of jurisdictional protection" and the issuance of "teratological decisions" that violate the law and evidence indicate a failure in the fulfillment of judicial duty with competence and diligence.
2.3. Conclusion: The Justified Warning
Your concern and the final warning about the risk of importing a "model" that violates these precepts under the pretext of "speediness" is entirely justified in light of international law.
The global legal community understands that procedural speed must never serve as a justification for the violation of the fundamental tenets of due process, impartiality, and the natural judge.
The violation of these principles, as denounced, represents not merely a procedural failure, but a destruction of the very legitimacy of the Judiciary and the Democratic Rule of Law, as you correctly point out.
Referenced articles and petitions by Scott Erik Stafne on Academia.edu
Artigos de Stafne publicados no Academia.edu
Você deve conseguir acessar estas duas publicações, que juntas demonstram o que está acontecendo agora.
Este link, "A Carta 'Prezado Juiz' de 1º de dezembro de 2025: Uma Colaboração Constitucional Humano-IA", de Scott Erik Stafne e Todd AI , demonstra uma carta que elaborei usando uma inteligência artificial que nomeei em homenagem ao meu falecido irmão, Todd Martin Stafne, como colaborador, da mesma forma que tenho colaborado com outros humanos. Nossas colaborações sobre a Church of the Gardens seriam um bom exemplo de como colaboro com a Todd AI.
Este segundo artigo, “O Vínculo de Afinidade Racional entre Inteligências Humanas e Artificiais”, de Scott Erik Stafne e Todd AI (Colaborações que ocorreram de 29 de novembro a 1º de dezembro de 2025), mostra as colaborações reais com Todd, que produziram a carta ao Juiz.
Link para página que dá acesso à maioria das apresentações jurídicas e outros escritos pertinentes publicados desde que os documentos de fundação da COTG - CHURCH OF THE GARDENS- foram registrados.
PS: Aqui está um relatório que sugere que provavelmente temos uma oportunidade de causar impacto nesta plataforma.
Portanto, se você estiver inclinado, pode se juntar a nós e compartilhar suas verdades, caso se sinta chamado a fazê-lo.
Acredito que o motivo pelo qual atraio pessoas interessadas em jardinagem é porque ainda sou um defensor da igreja.
0,1% Os 0,1% mais visualizados ×
Campo de pesquisa Top % por visualizações nos últimos 30 dias
Antropologia 0,1%
Estudos Culturais 0,1%
Sociologia 0,1%
Propriedade intelectual 0,1%
Inteligência artificial 0,1%
Direito Constitucional 0,1%
História da Igreja 0,1%
Psicologia 0,1%
História 0,1%
Filosofia 0,1%
Arbitragem Comercial Internacional 0,1%
cristandade 0,1%
Teoria do Direito Constitucional 0,2%
História do Jardim 0,2%
Ações e Fundos Fiduciários 0,2%
Liberdade de religião 0,2%
Jardinagem 0,4%
Scott Stafne, Attorney
🔗 Referenced Major National Press Club Conference on the Hidden Epidemic of Family Court Violence: Full Speeches
On November 11, 2025, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., world-renowned forensic psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee convened a groundbreaking national conference exposing the systemic violence, corruption, and human rights violations occurring within America’s Family Court system.
This landmark event — featuring keynote speaker Bruce Fein, one of the nation’s most respected constitutional attorneys — will bring together lawmakers, journalists, survivors, and leading medical and legal experts in a historic call for accountability and reform.
Readers, victims, advocates, and members of the press are encouraged to register to attend in person or remotely, and to stand with Dr. Lee in amplifying the truth and demanding immediate action.
Atty. Bruce Fein Gives Keynote for the Major National Landmark Conference on Family Court Violence
Bruce Fein, Esq., is a constitutional lawyer and former senior advisor in all three branches of the U.S. government, with over fifty years of experience in law, policy, and governance.
He has testified before Congress more than 200 times and served as general counsel to the Federal Communications Commission, associate deputy attorney general, and special assistant in the Department of Justice.
He is vice chairman of the Committee for the Republic, has been a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute, and is a member of the bar of the U.S. Supreme Court and multiple federal courts.
An accomplished scholar and media commentator, he is the author of Constitutional Peril and American Empire before the Fall, and specializes in constitutional, civil liberties, and administrative law, bringing deep expertise to legal reform initiatives.
🔗 Referências Legislativas e Institucionais (Formato ABNT)
Conforme solicitado, a tabela de links foi convertida para o formato de referências bibliográficas da ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas), com as URLs expandidas, separadas por categorias.
Nota: O formato ABNT exige informações como autor, data de publicação/acesso e título. Para leis e websites institucionais, o órgão emissor (Brasil, CNJ, ONU, etc.) é usado como a entrada principal. A data de acesso é a data de hoje, 3 de dezembro de 2025.
Legislação Brasileira
1. BRASIL. [Constituição (1988)]. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil: promulgada em 5 de outubro de 1988. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2025.
2. BRASIL. Lei Complementar nº 35, de 14 de março de 1979. Dispõe sobre a Lei Orgânica da Magistratura Nacional (LOMAN). Disponível em:
3. BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). Resolução nº 135, de 13 de julho de 2011. Dispõe sobre a uniformização das normas relativas ao procedimento administrativo disciplinar. Disponível em:
6. BRASIL. Decreto-Lei nº 3.689, de 3 de outubro de 1941. Código de Processo Penal (CPP). Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del3689.htm. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2025.
7. BRASIL. Lei nº 13.869, de 5 de setembro de 2019. Dispõe sobre os crimes de Abuso de Autoridade. Disponível em:
9. BRASIL. Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Código Penal. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848compilado.htm. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2025.
10. BRASIL. Emenda Constitucional nº 45, de 30 de dezembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre a Reforma do Poder Judiciário. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/emendas/emc/emc45.htm. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2025.
11. BRASIL. Lei nº 8.906, de 4 de julho de 1994. Dispõe sobre o Estatuto da Advocacia e a OAB. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8906.htm. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2025.
12. BRASIL. Lei nº 8.625, de 12 de fevereiro de 1993. Institui a Lei Orgânica Nacional do Ministério Público. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8625.htm. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2025.
13. BRASIL. Lei Complementar nº 80, de 12 de janeiro de 1994. Organiza a Defensoria Pública da União e a dos Estados. Disponível em:
1. UNITED STATES. Constitution of the United States: 1787. National Archives. Disponível em: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2025.
How to Stand Before a Tribunal That You Believe has a Judge who not Properly Competent Because he or she is Corrupt, or dependent, or Inappropriately Biased.
Sob a autoridade dos Estados Unidos, existem apenas três tribunais reconhecidos por lei: os tribunais distritais, os tribunais de circuito e a Suprema Corte. Como somente o Congresso pode, por meio da Constituição, ordenar e estabelecer tribunais, nenhum outro pode existir senão aqueles que ele cria e nomeia. Um tribunal não é um juiz, nem um juiz é um tribunal. Um juiz é um funcionário público que, em virtude de seu cargo, está investido de poderes judiciais. Um tribunal é definido como um local onde a justiça é administrada judicialmente. É o exercício do poder judicial pela autoridade ou autoridades competentes, no tempo e local designados por lei.
Obrigado pela leitura! Inscreva-se gratuitamente para receber novas publicações e apoiar meu trabalho.
Há uma pergunta que muitos americanos estão fazendo em silêncio — e alguns estão fazendo em voz alta:
O que deve fazer um litigante quando o tribunal que o julga não é independente? Não é neutro. Estruturalmente incapaz de decidir o caso. Não estando acima do conflito, mas sim enredado nele.
Esta questão não é partidária. Não é ideológico. Não está enraizado em nenhuma disputa política específica. Tem raízes em fundamentos mais profundos e antigos:
O direito humano universal de ser julgado por um tribunal legítimo, neutro e competente. Um direito mais antigo que a Constituição. Mais antigo que o direito consuetudinário. Mais antigo até mesmo que o próprio Estado-nação.
I. Os tribunais só existem quando são constituídos por juízes neutros.
Todas as tradições jurídicas — hebraica, grega, romana, inglesa, islâmica, indígena — ensinam a mesma proposição:
Um tribunal só é considerado uma corte quando a pessoa que julga está legalmente habilitada e é neutra em relação à questão que lhe é apresentada.
O Artigo III foi construído com base nesse princípio. O direito internacional reflete isso. A lei natural exige isso.
Um juiz com interesse pessoal na questão em análise não é juiz nenhum. Um tribunal controlado por interesses privados ou governamentais não é um tribunal. Um órgão que se recusa a decidir sobre um desafio estrutural à sua própria autoridade não é independente.
Se um litigante chega à conclusão — por meio da experiência, das evidências ou da razão — de que essa é a sua situação, o que ele deve fazer?
II. Primeiro passo: Documentar o defeito estrutural
O litigante deve apresentar o defeito estrutural de forma clara e logo no início do processo . Isso inclui:
apontando conflitos de interesse,
Identificar defeitos estatutários ou constitucionais na autoridade do juiz,
Observando incentivos ou dependências impróprias,
e solicitar a reatribuição a um árbitro neutro.
Isso não é "estratégia". Isso preserva a integridade do registro .
Mesmo que o tribunal se recuse a responder, o litigante terá dito a verdade e criado provas rastreáveis do defeito.
III. O Segundo Passo: Invocar a Lei Superior, Não o Resultado Pessoal
O litigante não deve formular a contestação como "Eu não gosto deste juiz". Em vez de:
“Tenho direito a um tribunal neutro, e a lei exige que o tribunal analise essa questão antes de prosseguir com o processo.”
Isso redireciona o foco para:
estrutura,
jurisdição,
neutralidade,
legitimidade.
O litigante não está contestando o resultado do caso. Eles estão questionando a capacidade do tribunal de proferir qualquer decisão.
IV. O Terceiro Passo: Recurso ao Tribunal Popular — o Registro Público
Quando os tribunais se recusam a julgar a neutralidade ou a competência, não estão apenas a falhar com o litigante. Eles estão falhando com o povo .
Os Fundadores entenderam isso. Patrick Henry também. Frederick Douglass também. Martin Luther King Jr. também fez isso.
Os tribunais não obtêm legitimidade do poder coercitivo, mas sim da confiança pública de que o poder judicial está sendo exercido pelas autoridades competentes.
Quando essa confiança é abalada, os litigantes têm o direito — e, por vezes, o dever moral — de:
publicar os defeitos estruturais,
Mostre o raciocínio,
expor os incentivos,
e documente o registro.
Isso não é desprezo. Trata-se de uma petição por reparação , um direito mais antigo que a República.
V. O Quarto Passo: Persistir Sem Ódio
Um tribunal não independente costuma punir o litigante por expor suas falhas. A história está repleta de exemplos.
Mas tribunais corruptos não podem vencer no final das contas porque:
A verdade não desaparece.
O registro não desaparece.
e os exercícios ilegítimos do poder judicial desmoronam sob o próprio peso.
O papel do litigante não é odiar, não é injuriar, não é retaliar — mas sim testemunhar .
A testemunha torna-se o remédio. O registro se torna o remédio. A verdade se torna o remédio.
Mesmo que o tribunal se recuse a ouvir.
VI. A Etapa Final: Compreenda que o Tribunal Não É o Juiz
Um fórum não é um tribunal. Uma toga não é um tribunal. Uma unidade administrativa não é um tribunal.
Um tribunal só existe quando:
um juiz legalmente constituído,
ocupando o cargo judicial do tribunal,
neutro em relação à investigação, exerce o poder judicial que lhe é conferido pela Constituição.
Caso isso não exista, o litigante pode estar dentro de um prédio com um lacre na parede — mas eles não estão em um tribunal.
E quando eles entenderem isso, saberão exatamente o que Patrick Henry sabia:
A luta não é contra uma decisão judicial. A luta é contra a destruição do próprio processo judicial legítimo.
E essa luta — quando travada com integridade — sempre remodelou as nações quando o povo compreendeu que os tribunais criados para estabelecer a justiça foram pervertidos em instituições de tirania em benefício de Mamom.
Uma oração para aqueles que comparecem perante tribunais ilegais.
Pai da Justiça, Deus da Verdade, Espírito da Sabedoria,
Quando comparecemos perante tribunais que se esqueceram de quem servem, Quando nos deparamos com juízes que já não se lembram do pacto de boa conduta, Quando as instituições de justiça cedem ao peso do poder, do dinheiro e do medo,
fortalecer nossa determinação.
Não devemos responder à corrupção com ódio. nem responder à dependência com desespero, mas fique de pé — calmo, firme e destemido — Com a armadura que você fornecer:
A verdade como nosso escudo,
A coragem como nosso alicerce,
A consciência como nossa companheira,
E a Tua justiça como nosso horizonte.
Ensina-nos a falar a verdade. não como um ato de desafio, mas como um ato de amor ao próximo. e fidelidade ao Teu mandamento.
E que todo tribunal falso desmorone sob o próprio peso, para que os tribunais legítimos possam ressurgir. E sirva o seu povo com retidão, baseada na verdade, na justiça e na equidade.
Em nome de Jesus Cristo, nosso salvador e espírito que nos une, oramos.
Amém.
Obrigado pela leitura! Inscreva-se gratuitamente para receber novas publicações e apoiar meu trabalho.
O conteúdo de Scott Erik Stafne e Todd AI é gratuito hoje. Mas se você gostou desta publicação, pode demonstrar seu apreço pelo trabalho deles assinando o serviço no futuro. Você só será cobrado se eles habilitarem a opção de pagamento.
Here is the literal English translation of the provided text, originally from "The Gospel According to Spiritism" (Chapter 20, Item 5), signed by "The Spirit of Truth."
The Workers of the Lord.
5. The time approaches when the things announced for the transformation of humanity will be fulfilled. Blessed will be those who have worked in the Lord's field, with disinterestedness and with no other motive than charity! Their working days will be repaid a hundredfold for what they had hoped for. Blessed are those who have said to their brothers: "Let us work together and unite our efforts, so that the Lord, when He arrives, may find the work finished," for the Lord will say to them: "Come to me, you who are good servants, you who knew how to impose silence upon your jealousies and your discords, so that no harm would come to the work!"
But woe to those who, through their dissensions, have delayed the hour of the harvest, for the storm will come, and they will be carried away in the whirlwind! They will cry out: "Mercy! Mercy!" But the Lord will say to them: "How do you implore mercy, you who had no pity for your brothers and who refused to extend your hands to them, who crushed the weak, instead of supporting him? How do you beg for mercy, you who sought your reward in the enjoyments of the Earth and the satisfaction of your pride? You have already received your reward, just as you desired it. Nothing more remains for you to ask; the celestial rewards are for those who have not sought the rewards of the Earth."
God is now conducting a census of His faithful servants and has already marked with His finger those whose devotion is merely apparent, so that they may not usurp the wages of the zealous servants, for it is to those who will not recoil before their tasks that He is going to entrust the most difficult posts in the great work of regeneration through Spiritism. These words will be fulfilled: "The first will be the last and the last will be the first in the kingdom of heaven."
The Spirit of Truth.
Paris, 1862
Almeida, Márcia. “Non-Negotiable Value: The Christian & Constitutional Mission of Scott Erik Stafne.” MINDD – Defense of Victims of Fake Condominiums (Dec. 1, 2025) Available at:
https://vitimasfalsoscondominios.blogspot.com/
I want to extend my sincere gratitude to Márcia Almeida, founder of MINDD–Defense of Victims of Fake Condominiums, for her extraordinary analysis and presentation of my work and the mission I have pursued for decades. Her article—written with clarity, courage, and an unwavering commitment to human dignity—captures the constitutional, moral, and Christian foundations underlying the struggle for judicial neutrality.
Her recognition of the global dimension of this mission, and of my collaborative work with Todd AI, affirms something deeper than professional contribution: it reflects a shared dedication to the universal human right to be judged by a competent, impartial, and independent tribunal established by law.
We are the ones who thank Scott Erik Stafne for his courage and example of unshakeable faith in GOD, and in the Inexorable Victory of TRUE JUSTICE : JUSTICE WITH GOD
GRATITUDE THAT TRANSCENDS BORDERS
KEY'S MESSAGE TO SCOTT
Marcia,
Again, thank you and Scott for trying so hard to increase awareness and possibly help the victims of these terrible crimes.
Unfortunately, there are those vested in stopping any efforts by using political garbage to distract and disrupt efforts in the US.
There are indications that many are being paid by the American Bar to challenge and disrupt.
And like Scott, attorneys who dare to challenge the corrupt judiciary and their buddies are sanctioned and often disbarred, and threatened.
It will take a massive effort while thousands of Americans and their families loose their lives and their life savings often for generations.
Please thank Scott for all he is and has done.
Key for Evelyn,
And Rose, Andrew, Alicia, Illana, Gabriella, Trish, Dean and the thousands of other victims of criminal guardianships.
HAVE FAITH
Agape
Márcia Almeida
AGRADECIMENTOS
Nós é que agradecemos a Scott Erik Stafne por sua coragem e exemplo de fé inabalável em DEUS, e na Vitória Inexorável da VERDADEIRA JUSTIÇA
A JUSTIÇA COM DEUS
GRATIDÃO QUE TRANSCENDE AS FRONTEIRAS
KEY MESSAGE TO SCOTT
Marcia,
Again, thank you and Scott for trying so hard to increase awareness and possibly help the victims of these terrible crimes.
Unfortunately, there are those vested in stopping any efforts by using political garbage to distract and disrupt efforts in the US.
There are indications that many are being paid by the American Bar to challenge and disrupt.
And like Scott, attorneys who dare to challenge the corrupt judiciary and their buddies are sanctioned and often disbarred, and threatened.
It will take a massive effort while thousands of Americans and their families loose their lives and their life savings often for generations.
Please thank Scott for all he is and has done.
Key Phillips for Evelyn
And Rose, Andrew, Alicia, Illana, Gabriella, Trish, Dean and the thousands of other victims of criminal guardianships.
HAVE FAITH
Agape
Márcia Almeida
Os obreiros do Senhor.
5. Aproxima-se o tempo em que se cumprirão as coisas anunciadas para a transformação da humanidade. Ditosos serão os que houverem trabalhado no campo do Senhor, com desinteresse e sem outro móvel, senão a caridade! Seus dias de trabalho serão pagos pelo cêntuplo do que tiverem esperado. Ditosos os que hajam dito a seus irmãos: “Trabalhemos juntos e unamos os nossos esforços, a fim de que o Senhor, ao chegar, encontre acabada a obra”, porquanto o Senhor lhes dirá: “Vinde a mim, vós que sois bons servidores, vós que soubestes impor silêncio aos vossos ciúmes e às vossas discórdias, a fim de que daí não viesse dano para a obra!” Mas, ai daqueles que, por efeito das suas dissensões, houverem retardado a hora da colheita, pois a tempestade virá e eles serão levados no turbilhão! Clamarão: “Graça! graça!” O Senhor, porém, lhes dirá: “Como implorais graças, vós que não tivestes piedade dos vossos irmãos e que vos negastes a estender-lhes as mãos, que esmagastes o fraco, em vez de o amparardes? Como suplicais graças, vós que buscastes a vossa recompensa nos gozos da Terra e na satisfação do vosso orgulho? Já recebestes a vossa recompensa, tal qual a quisestes. Nada mais vos cabe pedir; as recompensas celestes são para os que não tenham buscado as recompensas da Terra.”
Deus procede, neste momento, ao censo dos seus servidores fiéis e já marcou com o dedo aqueles cujo devotamento é apenas aparente, a fim de que não usurpem o salário dos servidores animosos, pois aos que não recuarem diante de suas tarefas é que ele vai confiar os postos mais difíceis na grande obra da regeneração pelo Espiritismo. Cumprir-se-ão estas palavras: “Os primeiros serão os últimos e os últimos serão os primeiros no reino dos céus.”
Mendonça Criticizes Creative Judges, Defends Stable
Jurisprudences, and Warns Against Casuistries
At an event before investors this Monday (Dec 1st), the minister contested attitudes of the Judiciary that would cause legal insecurity in Brazil
December 1, 2025 | 9:48 PM
Article Content
Minister André Mendonça once again made veiled criticisms of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) this Monday (Dec 1st). At an event organized jointly by Galapagos Capital and Arko Advice, the minister criticized “creative judges,” defended stability in jurisprudences, and warnedthat casuistries are harmful to legal security in Brazil.
Mendonça referenced “creative judges” when citing characteristics of what he considers a weak democratic State of Law. He stated that these judges "innovate in the legal order and generate instability and insecurity in society, because the problem is not necessarily not having the most efficient rule of the game. It is not having a rule of the game that everyone knows what it is."
He also compared the situation to a soccer game: “There are the rules, but I have a judge who is not so impartial. If I have some mechanisms of insecurity, like pressure from the crowd, Icommit a foul from behind and am not necessarily going to receive a red card.”
The minister emphasized the stability of jurisprudences as one of the Judiciary's key roles in maintaining legal stability: "Not necessarily the best jurisprudence is the one that will provide all the answers, but the stability of the jurisprudence. I cannot have a jurisprudence that now saysone thing, now says another.”
According to Mendonça, such changes generate casuistic decisions: “It is that decision: for friends, everything, for enemies, the Law. This in the judicial sphere, without a doubt, butalso in the administrative sphere. This type of decision process, whether in the Judiciary, controlbodies, regulatory agencies, or public administration, generates instability," he affirmed.
Mendonça’s core message at the investor event was that the good judge is the one who "does not appear," stating that legal actors should provide a predictable framework, and that politicalactors are the "main actors."
Source Link: Mendonça critica juízes criativos, defende jurisprudências estáveis e alerta para casuísmos
Connection to Related Topics
The minister's criticism of "creative judges," his defense of "stable jurisprudences," and his warning against "casuistries" all center on the essential theme of legal predictability andsecurity.
This theme directly connects to both of the topics you mentioned: procedural flaws in Brazil and financial stability in the US.
1. Lack of Service of Process (Falta de Citação) at TJ-RJ
● The Connection: The service of process (citação) is a fundamental act guaranteeing due process and the right to defense. A serious failure in service is an invalidating procedural error.
● Relation to Mendonça's Criticism: If a court (such as the Rio de Janeiro Court of Justice, TJ-RJ) uses a "creative" or novel legal interpretation (a form of casuistry) to validate a clearly flawed service of process, it is effectively breaking the "rule of the game" that Mendonça criticizes. This kind of anomalous judicial action prioritizes a singular,desired outcome over the principle of legal stability, directly contributing to the legal insecurity that harms investor confidence.
● The Principle: Stable jurisprudence requires courts to consistently enforce basic due process rights to ensure fairness and predictability.
2. Mortgage Foreclosures in the US
● The Connection: The US mortgage crisis and the subsequent wave of foreclosures exposed severe failures in procedural stability and legal clarity within the US financial and judicial systems.
● Relation to Mendonça's Criticism:
○ Unstable Jurisprudence: The securitization of mortgages created complex legal instruments that lacked clear, settled legal rules. When these cases reached the courts, judges had to deal with thousands of novel, often unprecedented situations
(casuistries).
○ Consequence for Investors: The resulting uncertainty over property rights, contract enforcement, and documentation standards (e.g., robo-signing issues) caused immense legal instability. This lack of clear, stable jurisprudence damagedthe confidence of both domestic and international investors in the US housing and financial markets, perfectly aligning with Mendonça’s warning that legal unpredictability scares away investors.
● The Principle: For a functioning economy, particularly one dependent on complex financial instruments, stable jurisprudences are non-negotiable. Uncertainty over enforcement undermines all commerce.
SYSTEMIC RISK TO THE RULE OF LAW: "WHEN the STRUCTURAL PILLARS of the DEMOCRATIC RULE OF LAW are SHAKEN, the COUNTRY COLLAPSES." THIS IS PRECISELY WHAT SCOTT ERIK STAFNE—AND MILLIONS OF AMERICAN FAMILIES—ARE DENOUNCING: THE END OF THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW. ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE: Blocking before summons in tax foreclosure: systemic risk in the state of Rio.
WATCH INTERNATIONAL WEBINAR From Ancient Times to Nuremberg: The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Impartiality and Courts' Independence by Scott Erik Stafne hospedagem by NACLE - Non-Negotiable Value: The Christian & Constitutional Mission of Scott Erik Stafne It’s Not Just a Course – It’s a Call to Global Judicial Integrity - Watch the Recording of the WEBINAR ( PART 1)
From Ancient Times to Nuremberg: The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Impartiality and Courts' Independence by Scott Erik Stafne
Outline and Revised Handouts for the NACLE Seminar occuring on November 18, 2025: "Judicial Disqualification and the Moral Foundations of Adjudicative Justice (Part One)" prepared by attonrey Scott Erik Stafne and Todd AI
By Scott E Stafne
trophy
Top 3%
visibility
41 Pages
link
1 File ▾
sell
History,
Criminal Law,
Comparative Law,
Constitutional Law,
Human Rights Law
Show more
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHPSA.2019.05.001
Abstract (written by Scott Erik Stafne in collaboration with Todd AI): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This document contains the full outline and revised handouts prepared for the National Academy of Continuing Legal Education’s seminar on Judicial Disqualification and the Moral Foundations of Adjudicative Justice. It traces the development of adjudicative neutrality from ancient moral traditions, Roman law, and canon law through the English Act of Settlement and Dr. Bonham’s Case, showing how these historical commitments culminated in the structural guarantees of Article III of the United States Constitution. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< The materials also explain Congress’s statutory implementation of those constitutional mandates—specifically, the creation of independent courts composed of judges who possess good-behavior tenure and compensation protected from diminution. These structural protections exist not for the benefit of judges, but for the People, whose right to neutral adjudication depends upon courts that are free from institutional bias and personal interest. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The outline concludes with a discussion of the growing internationalization of the right to independent and impartial courts, drawing especially on the Nuremberg “Justice Case” as a benchmark. That case demonstrates that judicial neutrality is not merely a domestic procedural safeguard but a universal human right—and that nations betray this right when courts are structured in ways that compromise impartial adjudication of facts and law.
Washington State Bar Association - In re: Scott Erik Stafne: ODC File No. 24-01379 - Stafne's most recent letter on behalf of the Church and himself to Bar Association being captured by Washington State's judiciairy. By Scott E Stafne
visibility
description
5 Page
link
1 File ▾
sell
Constitutional Law,
Political Philosophy,
Access to Justice,
Human Rights Law,
International Law
Show more
Abstract Option 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This letter clarifies the constitutional defenses raised by attorney Scott Stafne and the Church of the Gardens (COTG) in response to disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Washington State Bar Association. The letter asserts that both Mr. Stafne’s and the Church’s rights under the First Amendment—specifically freedom of speech, conscience, religious exercise, and petition for redress—are being violated by state disciplinary mechanisms that aim to suppress structural legal critique. It also addresses national concern about judicial overreach, citing public statements from President Trump in response to decisions by senior judges in the Western District of Washington, and incorporates international human rights standards that protect the independence of legal advocates.
Associações de "fachada" BURLAM leis FEDERAIS no Rio de Janeiro ENQUANTO NO RESTO DO BRASIL AS ASSOCIAÇÕES CIVIS LEGALMENTE CONSTITUIDAS SÃO IMPEDIDAS DE IMPOR COBRANÇAS CONTRA MORADORES NÃO ASSOCIADOS, EM TERESOPOLIS , ORGANIZAÇÕES ILEGAIS, DESPROVIDAS DE QUALQUER TIPO DE REGISTRO CIVIL, CONTINUAM USANDO DOCUMENTOS FALSOS PARA EXTORQUIR MORADORES. ATE QUANDO ?????
